Share this article:
Print

Mistakes at public housing blamed in woman's murder

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by ALEX REED / NewsChannel 36
E-mail Alex: AReed@WCNC.com

WCNC.com

Posted on January 27, 2010 at 7:44 PM

Updated Wednesday, Jan 27 at 7:51 PM

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- The family of an elderly woman who was killed inside her apartment is suing the city of Charlotte, saying management at the public housing complex violated policy, causing her death.

The convicted killer in this case has a criminal past. An expert witness testified Wednesday that the man has spent time in jail for murder before and claims he hears voices telling him to harm himself and others.

James Baugh, former assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, says the man should never have been allowed to live in the public housing complex where he robbed and killed his elderly neighbor.
 
"The inability to provide a safe and secure environment caused the death of Eva Dunlap Green," Baugh said on the witness stand.

Baugh says the convicted killer, Kenneth Cyrus, "Should never have been allowed in the public housing community in the first place."

He says there is no record of a criminal background check ever being performed on Cyrus.

Baugh says he performed his own background check and found Cyrus "was convicted of three drug felonies in the state of Maryland."
 
Baugh says HUD policies would disqualify Cyrus from living at the Charlottetown Terrace Apartments, just a few doors away from the victim, 63-year-old Eva Green.
 
"I was afraid of him myself," said neighbor Diane Lance about Cyrus. "He was sneaky and he watched. He watched everybody."
 
Another tenant, Carl Henderson, said, "Most elderly males and females were afraid to get on the elevator with him."
 
Both neighbors testified in court that they complained to management several times about Cyrus, but nothing was done.

"They told me they were checking into it every time I asked," said Lance.

City attorneys haven't called any witnesses yet, but have questioned whether the law requires national criminal background checks for all HUD applicants.

The killer's wife is expected take the stand Thursday.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

carolinagal said on February 10, 2010 at 1:59 PM

And we want to build more multi million$$ public housing apartment complexes. Atleast with a section 8 voucher you do not have a concentration of public housing in a small area. Also, the taxpayers do not have to pay for criminal background checks with section 8, nor have the added liability when something does go wrong. However, it is advisable for the landlord to pay for one. The taxpayers have to pay for the construction of these expensive apartment complexes, endure all liability, maintenance, and criminal background checks. I wish someone would pay for me an apartment in Ballantyne, do a background check on the neighbors, and boot the bad ones out. Let's not forget to let the taxpayer pay for my utilities. Wouldn't it be nice to sit on a nice couch, pop open a 40, watch the plasma w/ free cable and power it w/ free electric, and snack on some free food, and glance out the window and watch the slaves in Ballantyne working all day to support the apartment.

37372313
Flag this comment

jessthemom said on January 28, 2010 at 2:48 PM

This only happened because our justice system provides no justice. Any convicted murder needs to be taken out and HUNG immediately. Instead we provide them free room and board, free clothes, free health care, free tv, free gym membership for 12-15 years and then send them off to kill again. Freaking b.s.

36544167
Flag this comment

skyler said on January 28, 2010 at 9:02 AM

Why is someone who has a hx of murder allowed to be outside of prison? A life sentence should be for life, not a couple of years. It was not the voices who committed the crime. It was the convicted killer. I do have empathy for those who suffer from the anguish of internal stimulation, but do feel they should be held accountable for their actions.

36518264
Flag this comment

lunar366 said on January 27, 2010 at 11:25 PM

Let's see, free housing, free food, free clothing and free health care. Now I guess they expect free personal body guards to follow them around 24-7 What ever happened to personal responsibility?

36502944
Flag this comment

steph_carlisle86 said on January 27, 2010 at 11:01 PM

Not the public housing's fault, try the court systems! All convicted killers should be put to death or have life in prison. Once a killer, always a killer.

36502087
Flag this comment

dirtyetzio said on January 27, 2010 at 10:15 PM

I'm confused........apparently according to the article having a criminal record of some sort disqualifies you from public housing. Shouldn't most of our public housing complexes be like ghost towns then?!

36500177
Flag this comment

pokeinthenose said on January 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM

And you want these people running your health care.

36497169
Flag this comment

unbiased said on January 27, 2010 at 8:58 PM

"The inability to provide a safe and secure environment caused the death of Eva Dunlap Green," So, I guess now anyone who is victimized in Charlotte can sue the city for failing to provide a safe and secure environment. That's great!

36496389
Flag this comment

dbdj140229660945 said on January 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM

sorry for the familys loss

36494464
Flag this comment

glenb said on January 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM

wow! blame it on the govt. classic

36492922
Flag this comment